makeasound
mobile: 07940 525495 landline: 023 9234 6729
  • Home
  • DJ
  • For Sale
  • MAS amps
  • Who
  • Advice
  • Blog
  • Contact

DACs the way aha aha I like it…

9/6/2018

1 Comment

 
This is a review of the Starting Point Systems DAC 3 and the AMB Gamma 2.
Picture
​Have you seen those 4K TVs? The ones where everything is crystal-clear, every little detail is there for you to see… those cityscapes, every little window, the sharp edges, the definition, the vibrant colours, the effects of OLED and HDR and so on… Now, go and take a look out of a window and if it’s filthy, open it first… Are the edges as defined, the colours as vibrant?
 
Which do you prefer? Reality, or virtual reality? Your preference will most likely dictate which of these DACS you’ll pip for.
Picture
The AMB Gamma 2 is a ‘compact, high performance DAC’ considered a high-end DAC with all sorts of inputs and outputs, including a headphone output, 2 in fact. The digital audio stream is upsampled to 24bit/96kHz by an asynchronous sample rate converter (ASRC) and then converted to analogue with Wolfson’s top of the range delta-sigma oversampling DAC chip. There’s a choice of 3 in this unit, the WM8740, WM8741 or WM8742. This has the WM8741 chip… Then an on-board, ultra-low jitter oscillator provides the master clock for the ASRC and DAC chips.
 
On paper, it’s pretty much unbeatable. Mine was originally made by ‘Mister X’ and bought second-hand, direct from USA. Once I’d paid the import duty it was a shade over £100 and £100 well spent.
Picture
​The Starting Point Systems DAC 3 takes a completely different approach to digital to analogue conversion to the AMB and indeed most DACS. It uses a Phillips TDA1543 DAC chip which is considered antique in some audio circles, partly because it is! This ‘vintage’ DAC has a cult following though and uses a 16 bit technology (remember that?) and is a ‘non-oversampling’ (NOS) DAC. Note: NOS is not to be confused with ‘new old stock’ NOS which you’ll also see in the audio world. In this DAC there is no op-amp – it’s straight through at 2V, battery powered and charged through the USB port or a 12-15V PSU (that you’ll have to source separately). So, there’s less processing. Battery = clean, stable voltage delivery and, get this, there’s one battery for the analogue circuitry and another for the digital and the ‘reclocker’ isn’t ‘asynchronous’ but ‘adaptive’. I bought mine new, direct from Christophe for a shade over £100 once p&p had been factored in. Since they’re sold on ebay, you may pay more or less for one.
 
They both have the same inputs but the DAC 3 only has RCA/phono outputs. 
Picture
So what’s it like to listen to them…
 
The AMB Gamma 2 is tighter, harder and brighter. It shines. It’s that 4K digital sound and a very good DAC and been in-situ for about half a decade in my system(s). Compared to other oversampling DACS it’s a more rounded sound but compared to the DAC 3… well that’s a different story.
 
I once fired up the AMB in a decent kitchen set-up and my friend’s house (my good friend, Mark Pollard to be precise, the slightly better of the two of us as DJing!) the system comprised a pair of AVI Neutron IIIs (on loan from me) powered by a TA2024 T-amp. His response. ‘#TMI’ we were hearing so much more information, he found it overbearing. To be honest, I do admire the detail this AMB can unearth but it can be to the point of being ‘clinical’.
 
So over to the Starting Point Systems silver box… On plugging in the DAC 3 via USB from a laptop, the first thing I noticed was it’s flat. This may sound like a bad thing, but hear me out… a computer screen is flat, a TV screen is flat, a window is flat. I suppose what I really mean is ‘neutral’. You don’t notice the screen or the window if it’s doing nothing. The DAC sounds like it’s just conveying music. It’s completely integrated and unfatiguing. It’s ‘music’, not ‘reformed music’, or ‘music HD’. And with that neutrality, emotion flows with atmosphere and a realistic soundstage.
 
I’ve listened to all sorts of music from AC/DC to ZZ Top, from opera to dubstep in the house and in the garage (home office).
 
The acid test…
 
It’s quite easy to immediately prefer the toy you’ve just bought, so I instilled my wife’s input. She has no axe to grind, well not with DACS anyway. In asking her opinion, all she knew was this means something to me, so I booked her in for a listening sesh, 1 track, 2 DACS. She chose the track: John Denver – Country Road.​
 
She immediately picked out the DAC 3 as the better sound and therefore the winner. No contest.
 
The acid test 2…
 
How do they compare through a pro-audio DJ system?

To cut a long story short, the DAC 3 is better. Took it up to 103dB. Annoyingly, my pro-controller uses Wolfson DACS, partly chosen due to their natural sound, albeit not the top Wolfson chip but not much further down the range. Unfortunately, it’s not possible, as far as I know, to DJ going straight through to the DAC 3, or the AMB for that matter, since you can’t monitor the sound output before broadcast. An interesting test though.
 
History… what lead me to buy it?
 
One upon half a decade ago, I bought the AMB Gamma 2. I was using CDs less and less and wanted to recreate the fabulous sound of my CD player using my laptop instead. My brother had the same AMB DAC and when compared to his Bryson DAC using the same Wolfson chipset was pretty much indistinguishable in sound. Hence I bought the AMB.
 
But, there’s always a niggle… My CD player sounded better than either of them. It’s an Audio Note CD 2. This uses NOS DAC fed through a valve output and it’s sublime. It was also greatly improved on the advice of Peter Q by getting a New Old Stock Siemens valve for it. Best £30 I’ve ever spend on HiFi! So move on to Audio Note’s current ‘budget’ DAC and it had the Phillips TDA1543 chip used in NOS orientation and fed through a valve output stage. So the search for an affordable DAC, i.e. within MY budget, began.
 
Living with the DACs:
 
System matching…
 
They both look like hand-built projects, which is pretty much what they are. They are well-built and punch well above their weight for the price you’ll pay for them but they won’t win any awards for pretty. If there’s an award for portability or value they’d be up there.
 
Both cope with MP3 bitrates down to 128Kbps without sounding awful. Most of mine are 320Kbps with some FLAC and other lossless file types.
 
The AMB deals with headphones well, the DAC 3 doesn’t.
 
The DAC 3 is a more intuitive ‘plug and play’ and less sensitive to voltage irregularity. I feel this is, in part, due to the batteries which act as a kind of smoothing circuit.
 
I think the AMB looks better, especially in black but you should really be listening to the units rather than looking at them.
 
I don’t know how long the batteries will last with their USB charging and discharging but since they’re standard NiMH 9V (MN1604, PP3) I’m sure replacement would be a doddle.
 
If money was no object:
 
Dream on… but if I had endless wads of cash, I’d love to hear the Audio Note DAC 0.1x. I have a sneaky suspicion it’d beat these two but it is 10x the price.
 
I’d get some TDL Studio 1 floor standers or PMCs as my main set up, I’d try out the AVI DM5 with a sub-woofer and I’d have  media server with more music on it, or at least put a high-capacity solid state HDD in my laptop.

(Since I wrote this article, I've actually bought a pair of TDL Studio 0.75 speakers. They are astonishingly good! I'll review them soon).
 
But, the money pot is small, hence opting for the Starting Point Systems DAC 3 in my quest for audio excellence at affordable prices.
 
I’ve yet to compare the DAC 3 with my Audio Note CD2. I have a feeling its ability to convey emotion behind the music will win but again that was £1000 worth of CD player and it just won’t do USB from my laptop, so convenience wins. So saying, I’ve not used my CD2 in 2 years!
 
Finally, I’d like to add that in certain circumstances my iPhone 6 Plus audio output is a more pleasant listen than the AMB. It’s nearer to the DAC 3 sound although it does have a somewhat rolled off top end. I’m lead to believe that iPhone use a separate DAC in their phones rather than an integrated one which may be unique and may explain their superior sound to most other mobile devices. So, if you have an iPhone, try it, you may be shocked at what it’s capable of. Chances are you’ll find it difficult to get hold of the AMB Gamma 2 if you fancy one but I’m led to believe the Cambridge Audio Dacmagic Plus uses the same WM chipset and sounds similar.
 
If I had to keep just one of the DACs, I’d keep the Starting Point Systems DAC 3 it really is rather good. Time will tell if I sell the AMB, but I think I’m keeping both… for now.
 
Systems used for testing:
 
Listening room:
 
Creek OBH-12 passive pre
TA2024 Helder circuit board T-amp x2 in bi-amp configuration, 12V 5A PSU
TNT-audio inspired ‘FFRC’ speaker cable
Shark silver interconnects with WBT terminals
Acoustic Energy AE1 MK2 with dedicated stands
Yamaha subwoofer
Virtual DJ Pro 7 software to USB from laptop for music files and iTunes.
 
Lounge:
 
Creek OBH-22 passive pre
TA2024 Helder circuit board T-amp, 12V 3A PSU
Monitor Audio 7 speakers
Atecama SE25 stands
Yamaha subwoofer
FFRC speaker cables
Shark silver interconnects with WBT terminals
Picture
1 Comment

Hooked on Passive - a passive v valve pre-amp comparison

4/7/2014

0 Comments

 
Picture
This is a review of my experience comparing an Audio Note M-Zero with a Creek OBH-22 in a system comprising:

AE1 MKII speakers
TDL Nucleus SBR sub-woofer
TA2024-based power amp (biamped)
AMB Gamma 2 DAC from a laptop via the USB output
Speaker cables are ‘FFRC’
interconnects are Shark Silver Co-Ax with WBT terminals.

I’m a fan of T-amps, in particular the TA2024-based amplifier board from Helder-HiFi. I first heard about them from my brother, having set up a bare board into a kitchen set up and was blown away.

TA2024-based amps aren’t particularly powerful, but if your pursuit is quality over quantity for the price of pocket-money, I implore you to have a look and listen.

AE1 speakers even in MKII guise, are known for needing a fair amount of welly to get those metal cones moving, so I have my T-Amp doubled up in a bi-amp configuration, one for treble, one for bass.

I’ve read that valve-preamps marry up very nicely with the TA2024 power amps and that’s what I’ve been running for about 2 years in my domestic set-up.

You know how curiosity can get the better of you? Well, I wondered what my system would sound like if I ran the DAC straight off the power amp. You have to bear in mind that a laptop into a DAC has a variable output. Plug your CD player straight into the power amp and it’s going to be at full volume, so be careful!

Problem is, it sounded different… Quite a bit different. Now, if you’re pursuit of musical excellence is ‘truth’, this got me thinking and therein belies the review and comparison.

I’m not a professional reviewer, I just like listening to music in a system that is both convenient and doesn’t cost astronomical amounts of money.

So, what music did I use?

I particularly focussed on what I noticed and whether I liked it.

Please note that the attached videos are links to the tracks I listened to for reference. However, I used  MP3 audio format in the bitrate shown for the actual listening experience.


Rihanna - Please Don’t Stop the Music
(128kbps)

OBH-22

Delicate, detailed and ‘breathy’, wide stereo sound, but some sibilance on the word ‘music’.

M-Zero

Very much more obvious vocals, apparently sung with conviction. I find myself really listening to the words and the feeling. Lacking some detail but very ‘musical’.

Bill Withers - Grandma’s Hands
(192kbps)

OBH-22

Great separation, the cymbals and bass drum are excellent and the squeak of fingers as they drag up and down the guitar is eerily detailed.

M-Zero

Cymbals more pleasant to listen to, but I can’t help thinking it’s a bit dull compared to sitting near a real cymbal being percussed. Vocals still conveyed with feeling and emotion.

Animal - House of the Rising Sun
(128kbps)

OBH-22

Again, great cymbals, difficult to follow clavichord, a bit flat and unengaging.

M-Zero

The clavichord is much easier to follow, the vocals are softer, more listenable, but I can’t help thinking the sound is ‘veiled’.

The Honeycombs - Have I the Right
(128kbps)

OBH-22

Really brittle sounding. It lacks emotion. I don’t believe what the singer is saying. It’s as if they’re singing it for someone else.

M-Zero

It sounds like I’m listening to a 70s music-centre, clipped top and bottom end… Veiled and dull.

Toto - Rosanna
(320kbps)

OBH-22

Wow! That’s more like it. Excellent. Good bass slam and depth. Stereo separation incredible. That’s what cymbals are supposed to sound like. The detail and decay of the cymbals is awesome!... (OK so I was blown away!)

M-Zero

Mids are excellent. The piano and trumpet are smooth… but possibly ‘smoothed’.

Farley Jackmaster Funk, feat Darryl Pandy – Love Can’t Turn Around (320kbps)

OBH-22

I can hear the influence of ‘production’ upon the music. Free, open airy, unrestricted sound, with great stereo separation and oodles of bass without being ‘bloated’.

M-Zero

Where’s the ‘attack’? Where’s the bass? Where’s that ‘tish’ on the synth cymbals? What’s left?... There’s an echo on the vocals I’ve never noticed before and the bongos sound good, but a somewhat ‘staid’ sound.

The Divine Comedy – The Pop Singer’s Fear of the Pollen Count (192kbps)

OBH-22

The thump of the bass drum is tight, low and realistic. Real perception of depth; distance of vocalist from the microphone, the reverb. Although it’s quite a precise sound, it’s toe-tapping stuff.

M-Zero

Softer, lighter, watery sound. Lovely guitar… Ooh, a tambourine in the background. No real bass-thump though. Still a discernable bass line though.

Duffy – Warwick Avenue (320kbps)

OBH-22

It sounds like Duffy is here. Wow! Wide stereo imagery.

M-Zero

Smooth and sublime.


Summary

The first thing that hits me, is that the OBH-22 hits me! It’s harder, sharper, deeper, faster and ultimately, ‘freer’ – it sounds like the music has been liberated. I suppose electronically, it actually has.

The M-Zero experience is a smoother journey, possibly even more pleasant, conveying emotion and feeling exceptionally well, but it does alter the sound that’s fed to it. Pretty much all pre-amplifiers do, but the M-Zero 'prettifies' the music.

Conclusion

I feel the M-Zero is a better pre-amp if you want to hear the music, have it playing in the background in an unfatiguing way. However, if you want to listen to the music, and perhaps even analyse it, the OBH-22 is truer to the source by the very virtue of its circuitry. It literally lets through more of what it’s fed, sometimes wart ‘n’ all. Aesthetically, I feel the Audio Note is nicer… The Creek sticks out like a sore thumb in my predominately black system, but I like it. Both are remote amps so are just as convenient from the sofa. The M-Zero has more inputs (and outputs), the Creek maxes out at 3 inputs and that’s including the tape out and if you have ‘fat’ RCA/phono plugs you may have a problem squeezing them into their sockets!

… and finally

I’m now left wondering, do all passive pre-amplifiers sound the same?
0 Comments

    Author

    Alastair Hay of makasound.net

    Archives

    June 2018
    October 2016
    July 2014
    October 2012

    Categories

    All
    Alexander Loudspeakers
    Alexander SE2 Loudspeakers
    Alexander SE2 Speakers
    AMB Gamma 2 DAC
    Audax
    Audio Note M-Zero
    Award Winner
    Creek OBH-22
    Elac
    Infinite Baffle
    Jpw
    Jpw Sonata
    Jpw Sonata Review
    Makeasound
    Makeasound.net
    May 1991
    NOS DAC
    Passive
    Passive Amplifier
    Passive Pre-amp V Valve Pre-amp
    Review
    Small Speaker Review
    Starting Point Systems
    Starting Point Systems DAC3
    TA2024
    T-amp
    TDA1543 DAC
    Valve Amplifier

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.